Biting Mad: When Rabies Becomes the Reel Villain

Summary

Rabies has stalked the screen for decades, not just as a disease, but as a symbol of primal fear, uncontrollable rage, and the thin line between animal and human. While the virus itself is horrifying—nearly 100% fatal once symptoms begin—its cinematic legacy leans more toward myth than medicine. In films, rabies often transcends biology to become a metaphor for the loss of reason, invasion of the mind, and the danger of what lies just beneath the surface.

From Stephen King’s Cujo to a chilling Criminal Minds twist, rabies has infected more than the body—it’s haunted the screen for decades. In this episode, Heather unravels how rabies—through its terrifying biology—evolved into a cultural icon of madness, fear, and transformation.

Listen here or scroll down to read full episode.

Full Episode

The Dog Wasn’t Evil. It Was Sick.

A St. Bernard. Big. Lovable. The kind of dog kids climb on. The kind you trust. He’s chasing a rabbit through the fields of rural Maine—until the rabbit ducks into a dark cave. And Cujo follows. Inside, a bat. We don’t see much. Just a flash of teeth, the sound of a yelp. One bite. That’s all it takes.

The next time we see him, he’s not the same. His eyes are wild. His chest heaves with every breath. Drool pours from his mouth like foam from a broken engine. He growls, he snarls, he snaps. And the people who once loved him now see only...a monster.

Not because he’s angry. Not because he’s evil. But because he’s infected. This isn’t a monster story. It’s a rabies story.

This is Biting Mad: When Rabies Becomes the Reel Villain.

Before we get into the science—and the stories—I want to pause for a second. If you’ve listened before, you know this podcast doesn’t do fear-mongering. Yes, rabies is a terrifying virus. But this episode isn’t about stoking panic—it’s about understanding. We’re looking at how our fear of rabies—ancient, visceral, and very much backed up by its science—has shaped how we tell stories in horror, thrillers, and dramas.

And as a fan of the genre, I’ve structured this episode with a few cinematic nods at tension and suspense—not to scare you, but to explore why this disease lends itself so well to those narratives. So, think of this episode as part public health, part pop culture, and part creature feature.

OK, then, why does this particular virus—of all viruses—haunt our stories, our nightmares, our screens? Why has rabies become the go-to metaphor for rage, madness, and the moment when something—or someone—turns?

Today, we'll tackle that and unravel how rabies—through its terrifying biology—evolved into a cultural icon of madness, fear, and transformation.

Infection Begins: What Makes Rabies So Cinematic?

There’s something about rabies that feels made for the screen. Not because it’s flashy or supernatural—but because it’s visceral. Foaming mouths. Wild eyes. A sudden snap from calm to carnage. It’s a disease that looks like a monster movie even before the script starts rolling.

Rabies doesn’t creep. It lunges. It doesn’t negotiate. It possesses.

And in visual storytelling—especially horror—that kind of transformation is gold. The progression from ordinary to uncontrollable is something we can see, frame by frame: a gentle dog starts snapping, a man who once made sense starts slurring his words and growling at the sink. It’s horror without fantasy—a biological descent into chaos, right in front of our eyes.

But rabies isn’t just cinematic because it’s violent. It’s cinematic because it’s inevitable. There is no cure once symptoms begin. The case fatality rate hovers near 100%. That means rabies doesn’t offer redemption arcs or second chances—only dread. Existential, unstoppable dread. You can run. You can hide. But once the virus reaches your brain, there is no coming back.

And that’s before we even get to how it spreads.

Bats. Foxes. Dogs. Raccoons. The idea that a seemingly harmless encounter with an animal—your pet, your hiking trail, your backyard—could spiral into madness and death? That hits a primal nerve. It blurs the boundary between nature and threat. Between familiar and fatal.

Which is why rabies so often becomes more than a virus in fiction. It becomes a symbol.

It represents the loss of control—over your body, your mind, your instincts. It taps into fears of transformation: from human to beast, from reason to rage. And in doing so, it mirrors something deeper in our culture—the fear that the very things we love, the things we trust, could turn on us without warning.

So yes, rabies is a virus. But in film and TV, it’s also a metaphor: For madness. For betrayal. For the moment when the ordinary world breaks. And that’s where we’re going next—because to understand why rabies hits so hard on screen, we need to look at what it actually does to the brain.

This is the monster’s origin story.

🧬The Science of a Monster Virus

Rabies 101

Rabies isn’t just a modern menace, it’s one of the oldest recorded diseases in human history. The first written descriptions appear as far back as 2300 BCE in Egypt, and by the time of Aristotle, its terrifying symptoms were already well known in ancient Greece. Across cultures—from the sacred texts of Zoroastrianism to the compendium of teachings important in Ayurveda—canine madness was recognized and feared. But the breakthrough didn’t come until 1885, when Louis Pasteur, understanding neither the full biology nor structure of the virus, performed a medical miracle: he administered the first rabies vaccine to a young boy named Joseph Meister, who had been attacked by a rabid dog. That act not only saved a life—it marked the beginning of modern infectious disease science. Since then, advances have continued, from viral identification in the early 1900s to mass oral wildlife vaccination campaigns in Europe. Yet, for all our progress, rabies remains one of the deadliest viruses on Earth—and one of the most mythic.

Rabies isn’t just horror-inspired—it is horror, down to its molecular core. A microscopic killer engineered by evolution for stealth, invasion, and control. If you wrote this virus into a horror screenplay, you’d be accused of exaggeration.

Let’s start with the biology. Rabies virus belongs to the Rhabdoviridae family of viruses and is in the genus Lyssavirus, named after Lyssa, the spirit of mad rage in Greek mythology. Lyssa is described as the daughter of Night and, in some accounts, from the blood of Uranus after his castration. I feel like I should maybe change my name to Lyssa. Anyway, under a microscope, the shape of the rabies virus is unmistakable: bullet-like—pointed, purposeful, and built to invade. But it doesn’t explode on contact like Hollywood would have us believe.

No. Rabies is a slow burn. It plays the long game.

After entering through a bite or scratch, the virus first replicates quietly in muscle tissue near the wound. During this phase, there are no symptoms, no clues (more on this phase later). The victim may not even know they’re infected. Meanwhile, the virus begins its invasion of the nervous system.

Here’s where it gets insidious.

The Brain Hijack

The rabies virus hijacks peripheral nerves, traveling upstream along axons in a process called retrograde axonal transport—like a ghost moving backward through the wiring of your body. It doesn’t set off immune alarms. It doesn’t cause inflammation. It just advances.

Rabies begins at the bite site, often targeting neuromuscular junctions rich in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors—molecular gateways that allow the virus to enter neurons. Highly innervated areas like the hands or face are especially vulnerable, with head and neck exposures often leading to faster progression.

Once inside, the virus creeps toward the spinal cord, stopping first at the dorsal root ganglia—clusters of nerve cells where early symptoms like tingling or pain may flare. Then it slips silently into the central nervous system, where it transforms from sleeper agent to saboteur.

In the brain, rabies is terrifyingly selective. It targets the brainstem, hippocampus, and hypothalamus—regions that govern aggression, fear, swallowing, and autonomic survival functions. The infection spreads centrifugally (meaning it spreads outward from a central point), reaching tissues like the salivary glands, where it causes frothing and drooling—not as a theatrical effect, but as a biological imperative for viral transmission.

And the most chilling part? The brain doesn’t fight back. Rabies suppresses key immune responses, including type I interferon, allowing it to replicate unchecked. Neuron by neuron, it rewires its host. Continued viral replication leads to encephalitis, nervous system failure, and death. That’s not poetic metaphor. That’s neuroscience.

Now for the Symptoms. So rabies symptoms are awful. I mean of course it has the standard non-specific symptoms of most viral infections, but then you get the tell-tale signs. And the “furious” form of rabies is cinematic by design: agitation, delirium, paranoia, muscle spasms, hallucinations, and hydrophobia—a spasmodic, reflexive panic at the sight or sound of water. Victims may foam at the mouth not from rage, but from the inability to swallow. Some become terrified of air currents. Others, catatonic.

There’s also a quieter version called paralytic rabies, where the nervous system begins to shut down limb by limb. There are no snarls or snarling dogs here—just creeping paralysis and coma. One is overt horror; the other, slow annihilation.

Both are universally fatal once symptoms appear.

And if infection is suspected—there’s only one way to be sure.

🪓 For animals, the head must be removed. Rabies diagnosis requires sending the brain tissue for testing. That means decapitation. Veterinary staff, often with heavy hearts, must remove the head and ship it to diagnostic labs under strict protocols. It’s clinical. It's necessary.

But it’s also deeply disturbing—a moment where science veers into something that looks like horror.

💉 Why the Head?

So here’s a question you might be asking:

If humans can be tested for rabies while still alive, why do animals have to be euthanized and decapitated to confirm the disease?

The answer lies in the biology of the virus—and the reliability of the tests.

Rabies doesn’t travel through the blood the way some viruses do. It moves through the nervous system, concentrating in the brain as it reaches its final—and most dangerous—phase. That’s why the most accurate tests rely on detecting virus antigen or RNA in brain tissue, especially the brainstem and cerebellum.

In humans, we can test saliva, cerebrospinal fluid, and even a small skin biopsy from the back of the neck. These tests can detect rabies virus RNA or antigen while someone is still alive—but only if the virus is actively being shed, which doesn’t always happen. So even for humans, a negative test before death doesn’t completely rule out infection. That’s why post-mortem testing of brain tissue is still the gold standard, even for humans.

But in animals, we can’t assess symptoms through communication. And we don’t take risks when rabies is on the table—because the stakes are too high. That’s why euthanasia and head removal are often required when rabies is suspected in animals.

The Direct Fluorescent Antibody test, (DFA or FA) is the most common method. It’s fast, highly sensitive, and recommended by both the World Health Organization and the World Organisation for Animal Health. But it requires a small piece of brain.

It’s not horror fiction. It’s public health.

Still, it’s hard to shake the image: a disease so feared, so lethal, that we literally remove heads to be sure. Rabies doesn’t just end lives—it demands a kind of narrative finality. Diagnosis through dismemberment. Horror made protocol.

Rabies and the Roots of Horror

What gives rabies its unmatched horror pedigree is not just that it kills—but that it possesses. It transforms behavior from the inside out. The infected host becomes unpredictable. Familiar beings—pets, loved ones, even oneself—become unrecognizable.

And that’s the fear at the heart of rabies, both medically and metaphorically: the collapse of the self. Long before we understood viruses or neurotropism, rabies was already infecting our imaginations. A bite that changes you. A sickness that turns loved ones into threats. That’s not just a public health fear—that’s horror.

Susan Sontag, in Illness as Metaphor, argued that diseases absorb the fears of their era. Rabies absorbs ours: violence without cause, rage without warning, and the monstrous inside the ordinary. The plausible horror. And it still walks among us. Rabies doesn’t just haunt emergency rooms. It haunts fiction. In fact, it helped shape some of horror’s oldest and most enduring monsters.

Beyond being a terrifying disease, rabies is a narrative blueprint. As infectious disease historian Jeffrey Sartin points out in his paper “Contagious Horror: Infectious Themes in Fiction and Film,” contagious illness has haunted literature since Gilgamesh and Exodus. But horror really sharpened its teeth in the 19th century—when anxieties around science, sexuality, and society collided.

The vampire, for example, is more than a myth—it’s a metaphor for infection. Dracula’s bite transmits something incurable. The victim weakens, loses control, and becomes a monster themselves. Sartin links this directly to fears about rabies, syphilis, and even tuberculosis. And if you look at the symptoms of vampirism—light sensitivity, strange appetites, altered mental states—they overlap eerily with rabies' neurological effects.

The same goes for my favorite: werewolves. Originally seen as victims of curses, they were reimagined in the early 20th century as bite-driven transformations—violent, terminal, and tragically out of control. Sartin argues that rabies was the real-life inspiration for these frenzied shifts—not magic, but pathogen. A single bite, and identity, behavior, even humanity, begin to unravel.

And in that sense, horror doesn’t just exaggerate rabies—it understands it.

Cujo – The Dog, The Virus, The Horror

"The dog wasn’t evil. It was sick.”

That’s the line that lingers after reading Cujo—not because it’s whispered, but because it’s the unspoken truth beneath every growl, every attack. This wasn’t a demon. This was a pet. A 200-pound St. Bernard named Cujo… transformed into something terrifying.

It starts, like so many rabies cases do, with a bat. Cujo chases a rabbit into a cave—and a bite that takes only seconds sets off a slow-burning tragedy. What begins as confusion and lethargy morphs into rage, violence, and ultimately, death.

Stephen King’s 1981 novel is a horror story—but it’s also a disease story. And in many ways, it gets the science surprisingly right. Cujo doesn’t turn into a supernatural monster. His body changes. His brain inflames. He stops recognizing the people he once loved. The symptoms track chillingly well with the “furious” form of rabies: a progression from subtle behavioral changes to confusion, foaming at the mouth, disorientation—and eventually, collapse.

One Reddit user put it perfectly:

“The book even reminds the reader… he was just a good loving boy who did none of this of his own volition. It was the rabies that made him confused and violent.”

The 1983 film adaptation sticks fairly close to the novel, but makes two major shifts. First, it gives us a more hopeful ending—Tad survives. And second, it strips away Cujo’s internal perspective. In the novel, we feel his confusion. His pain. His struggle to resist the infection’s grip. On screen, we only get the monster. Growls, lunges, blood.

It’s still terrifying—but it’s horror turned outward. I’ve been reading Stephen King since the early ’80s, and in all that time, few of his stories have unsettled me like Cujo. It’s not just the fear of what’s outside—it’s that horror that turns inward. King delivers a uniquely terrifying vision where the real terror isn’t supernatural, but psychological—and that’s the kind that doesn’t just keep you up at night… it makes you afraid to close your eyes.

🎥 Cinematic Horror: Claustrophobia, Heat, and Isolation

What the film version of Cujo does bring to life viscerally is the atmosphere of dread. Most of the second half takes place inside a broken-down car, where a mother and her young son are trapped for days under the hot sun while Cujo stalks them just feet away. There’s no water. No help. Just the sound of his growl and the knowledge that he’s still out there. Still waiting.

The car becomes a crucible—a symbol of helplessness, of nature turned against us. The isolation and heat ratchet up the horror not through gore, but through psychology. It’s an almost perfect visual metaphor for disease: you’re trapped inside something small, your options shrink, and the danger grows closer.

Cujo isn’t just about a dog losing control—it’s about the collapse of the familiar. A safe home invaded. A loyal companion turned enemy. Love weaponized.

The horror lands because the facts of rabies are so raw. The virus isn’t scary because it’s dramatic. It’s scary because it’s real—and because it hijacks the very thing we rely on most: our brains.

⚖️ What the Film Gets Wrong (and Why It Still Works)

To be fair, the film takes liberties. Cujo’s decline is fast—much faster than rabies typically progresses. In real life, rabies has an incubation period of weeks to months. And most infected animals become weak and disoriented, not supercharged juggernauts. The sustained physical strength Cujo displays? That’s Hollywood.

Hydrophobia—one of rabies’ most iconic symptoms, especially in humans — doesn’t really come up either. But to the movie’s credit, it stays grounded in physicality. There are no glowing eyes. No supernatural reveals. Just a dog, suffering — and the devastation he leaves behind.

In Cujo, rabies is both villain and vessel. It’s a way to tell a story about fear, control, and the betrayal of what we love most. And unlike many horror monsters, Cujo doesn’t disappear with the credits.

Because rabies? Rabies is still here. And it’s still deadly.

So yes—Cujo is a monster movie. But the monster isn’t the dog. It’s the virus.

But while Cujo gives us the horror of a beloved pet overtaken by disease, Criminal Minds takes things a step further — imagining what happens when rabies isn’t just a tragedy, but a tool of terror.

Rabies as Weapon, Not Disease

Picture this: a string of victims, each found with bite marks. Foaming mouths. Violent outbursts. Death within days. The culprit? Rabies. But the killer doesn’t have it—he’s using it. As a weapon.

That’s the premise of “Rabid,” Season 9, Episode 18 of Criminal Minds. In this storyline, a man is abducted and forced to be bitten by a rabid dog. Once infected, he becomes the first link in a chain of terror—biting others under duress or confusion, unknowingly spreading the virus. The real villain orchestrates the horror from a safe distance, never getting infected himself.

🧠 Neurological Horror: What Rabies Does to the Brain

Rabies is one of the most neurologically invasive viruses we know. Its symptoms — confusion, hallucinations, agitation, aggression (in some but not all human cases), and hydrophobia — are what give rabies such cinematic appeal. In its furious form, it’s dramatic. It’s terrifying. But it’s important to note: in real human cases, the more common symptoms are anxiety, delirium, and disorientation—not uncontrollable violence.

A 2017 review in Veterinary Quarterly explains that rabies causes fatal encephalitis by invading the central nervous system without triggering a strong immune response. It hijacks cognition, impairs motor control, and alters behavior—but it doesn’t turn people into compulsive biters.

A Scene Worth Noting: Character Drama Meets Viral Drama

There’s a telling moment in the episode when the team realizes what they’re dealing with:

Rossi: “I was attacked by a rabid fox once. Shot the thing three times before it went down. Freakin’ terrifying. It was like a horror movie.”

Reid: “Yikes. We need to have the ME test for rabies vectors in the brain samples.”

Morgan: “And then we need to deliver the profile.”

(me: I've always wanted to say that.)

It’s peak Criminal Minds: gritty anecdote, dry comic relief, and then boom—plot pivot. But also? Scientific slip.

“Rabies vectors in brain samples” makes no sense. The term vector refers to the carrier of a pathogen (like a bat or a raccoon), not something you’d find in brain tissue. What they likely meant was rabies antigen or RNA, which are standard targets in post-mortem tests like DFA or PCR. It’s a minor fumble—but one that underscores how scientific accuracy is often sacrificed for drama.

❌ What the Episode Gets Wrong

• Human-to-human transmission: The episode relies on infected victims biting others to pass on rabies. In reality, confirmed human-to-human rabies transmission is virtually nonexistent. The only known cases have occurred via organ transplants, not bites.

• Rabies causes biting in humans: Rabies can lead to aggression and agitation, but compulsive biting behavior in humans is fictionalized. It’s common in animals, rare to nonexistent in people.

• Symptom and Vaccine timeline: To the show’s credit, Criminal Minds does get one thing partially right: they suggest the victims are held for about a month before dying — which they attribute to rabies' incubation period. And yes, rabies can incubate for weeks or even months.

  But here's the catch: incubation periods for rabies aren’t consistent. They vary widely depending on the bite location, viral load, and individual response. So the idea that every victim would follow the exact same timeline? That’s dramatic license, not medical reality.

  Then the episode raises the stakes with a fictional twist: the killer has somehow shortened the incubation period, turning rabies into a kind of biological ticking clock. It’s great for suspense — but it also forces the show into misinformation.

  At one point, Reid says:

  “Post-exposure prophylaxis is only effective if administered within 24 hours of infection. Once symptoms appear, the prognosis is death.”

  That last part is true. Once symptoms appear, it’s almost always fatal. But the 24-hour window? Completely false. PEP is effective any time before symptoms begin—which can be days or even weeks post-exposure. There’s urgency, yes. But not a one-day countdown. Still, the writers needed the pressure, so they sacrificed the science.

Rabies as a Story Device

Despite these liberties, the episode gets something deeply right about rabies: its power as a symbol. The virus isn’t just a pathogen here—it’s a tool. A weapon. The fear is not only of illness, but of losing control, of being turned into a danger to others. Rabies becomes a narrative shortcut for transformation—not slow decay, but a switch flipped.

Disease and Violence

Some researchers have explored whether viral encephalitis—including rabies—could play a role in behavioral changes, even criminality. But the consensus is clear: rabies doesn’t make you a killer. It incapacitates far more than it incites.

Still, as Susan Sontag famously observed in Illness as Metaphor, society often loads disease with moral meaning. We don’t just see it as biology — we see it as breakdown. A fall from grace. A turning point. In that sense, Criminal Minds isn’t just exploiting a scary virus. It’s echoing a deeper fear: That infection could erase identity. That disease could turn the body into a weapon—and the mind into a stranger.

What Rabies Really Looks Like

Rabies doesn't just infect the nervous system—it infects the mind with fear itself. And for the people who’ve survived encounters with rabid animals, that fear doesn’t fade after the bite. It lives in the muscle memory of adrenaline, in the scars, and in the impossible choice between fight or freeze.

One such story began in the water, on a warm day at Georgia’s Lake Lanier. A young girl had been swimming when a 50-pound beaver—enormous by any measure—lunged at her and bit. Her father dragged her to shore and killed the animal. It tested positive.

Elsewhere, a 90-year-old woman stepped outside her home. A fox, hiding beneath a parked car, leapt out and bit her before she could scream. She grabbed a rake to fight it off. But the fox didn’t stop. It moved on—attacking dogs, other neighbors—until someone finally killed it. Even in death, it felt relentless.

Sometimes, rabies comes from above—like the case of a 10-year-old boy in Mississippi who had handled a bat in the spring and died months later, with no clear bite, just a fever and confusion. Only after death was rabies confirmed.

Then there were stories that felt like horror movies—too raw, too vivid. A family hiking in New Hampshire was ambushed by a rabid coyote. It lunged for the toddler’s snowsuit, circled back to attack again, and even when pinned by a grown man, it waited—waited—for its chance to strike once more. The father later described trying to strangle it. Not out of rage. Out of survival. “It was wild,” he said. “A rabid animal that wanted to annihilate us.”

And then, there was the raccoon.

A hiker in Maine, walking alone near home, watched in disbelief as a raccoon barreled out of the woods, snarling. It was small but fast—a blur of fur, teeth, and blind aggression. The animal sank its fangs into her thumb and refused to let go. The hiker ended up face-down in a shallow puddle, using the only weapon available—the water—to drown the raccoon as it held on until the very last second. “Its chest was still heaving,” she later wrote. “But it was clearly done fighting.”

These weren’t cinematic exaggerations. There were no full moons. No zombie transformations. Just ordinary people, facing a virus that doesn’t just kill—it hijacks. The body, the brain, and the primal will to survive.

And even though for these stories the animals exhibited typical rabies associated behavior, not all infected animals will act rabid.

Rabies can look very different and more subtle than what we might expect. Sometimes, it’s just a change in behavior. A friendly cat turns aggressive. A playful puppy becomes timid and withdrawn. A raccoon, normally nocturnal, is wandering your yard in broad daylight.

And then there are the less obvious signs: chewing at the bite site, pawing at the mouth, struggling to swallow, refusing food, or even eating things that aren’t food at all. Some animals become hypersensitive to touch or sound. Others have seizures. Many show signs of paralysis.

The point is, rabid animals don’t always fit the Hollywood mold. They might not growl or snap. They might not foam at the mouth. But they’re still infected—and still dangerous. So be aware.

You really don't want to get bitten. Because with rabies, the bite is only the prologue and survival depends on what happens next.

What Happens After the Bite

OK, so rabies usually enters the body in one sharp, sudden moment—an animal bite.

The virus lives in the saliva of infected mammals, and when that saliva makes contact with broken skin, it starts a silent journey. Dogs remain the most common source worldwide, especially in areas where stray dog populations are under-vaccinated. Bats are the top risk in the Americas. And yes—scratches, organ transplants, and even corneal grafts have also caused rare cases.

⏳ Incubation: A Silent Countdown: Here’s the unnerving part: After that bite, there might be no symptoms at all—for weeks to years, even, though the average is 3-8 weeks.

That’s because rabies takes its time. It replicates slowly in muscle tissue before hitching a ride along the nerves—in a process called retrograde transport, like a ghost moving upstream—until it reaches the central nervous system.

And once it’s there, things change fast. As I mentioned earlier, there are two main clinical forms of rabies:

1. Furious rabies—the one we know from film. Frenzied aggression. Confusion. Hallucinations. Fear of water—or hydrophobia—as the muscles used to swallow become spastic, making drinking both painful and terrifying. Light and sound sensitivity. Insomnia. Paranoia. Delirium.

2. Paralytic rabies—the quiet twin. This form is more insidious, causing weakness and paralysis that mimic other neurological conditions. It’s slower and harder to diagnose but just as fatal.

🩹 PEP: Post-Exposure Prophylaxis—The Race Against Time

But here’s the good news, and it’s really good: Rabies is preventable. If you get medical attention before symptoms appear, survival is not just possible—it’s likely.

The protocol is called Post-Exposure Prophylaxis, or PEP. It’s a multi-step process:

• Wound cleansing—wash the bite thoroughly with soap and water.

• Rabies immunoglobulin (anti-rabies antibodies)—injected around the wound to offer immediate, short-term protection.

• A series of vaccines—typically given over 14 days to train your body to fight the virus.

Timing is everything. PEP must begin before the virus reaches the central nervous system—that’s your only window. But not everyone gets treatment in time. And in 2004, one teenager didn’t—yet somehow, she lived.

🧪 A Survival Story—and a Scientific Reality Check

Meet 15-year-old Jeanna Giese, who in 2004 was bitten by a bat after church in Wisconsin. She didn’t receive PEP. Weeks later, she became the first known person to survive rabies without vaccination—using an experimental approach now known as the Milwaukee Protocol. It involved inducing a therapeutic coma to give her immune system time to respond.

It was groundbreaking. And for a time, it gave hope.

But nearly two decades later, the picture is more complicated. According to a 2022 review of cases managed with the Milwaukee Protocol since 2015, only one patient is confirmed to have survived—and even that diagnosis was ambiguous. The majority of patients treated with the protocol died, most from respiratory or cardiac failure, and often despite receiving PEP. Critics now warn that induced coma may cause more harm than help, with risks including nosocomial infections (those are infections you get while in the hospital for something else), immune suppression, and misapplication in patients with unclear diagnoses.

🧬 When Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Fails

But, unfortunately, not all PEP stories end well, either. In really rare cases, PEP doesn’t work and in other rare cases, PEP might not be fully administered correctly. For example, in India, a man died of rabies despite reportedly receiving treatment; investigators concluded the immunoglobulin may have been improperly administered.

And in 2021, an 84-year-old man in Minnesota became the first reported case in the Western Hemisphere of fatal rabies following full PEP with a cell-culture vaccine. Researchers attributed the failure to host-mediated immune impairment—essentially, his body didn’t mount the response it needed and that turned out to be because he had an undiagnosed underlying immune deficiency. The case sparked a call for clinicians to consider antibody titer testing after PEP if a patient is immunocompromised or high-risk.

🆕 Update from 2025: A Tragic Case in India

Just this month, news broke from Madhya Pradesh of a 14-year-old boy who died of rabies despite reportedly receiving "an anti-rabies injection" after a dog bite. While investigations are ongoing, the details echo other fatal cases where PEP was incomplete. It’s a heartbreaking reminder that partial protection is not protection when it comes to rabies—and underscores how critical proper training, supply, and awareness remain, especially in rabies-endemic regions. Together, these cases show that while rabies is vaccine-preventable, it’s not foolproof. Timing, access, technique, and host factors all matter. And once symptoms begin, there is still no reliable cure.

So what should you do if bitten?

• If you’re bitten by an animal, especially a stray or wild mammal: wash the wound and seek emergency care immediately.

• Don’t wait for symptoms. Don’t assume you’re fine.

• In some regions, even exposure to a bat in a room while sleeping or unconscious may warrant PEP—because tiny bites may go unnoticed. Their tiny teeth are so sharp and so small that you can actually get bitten and not feel it. This is why you do not handle wild bats that fly into your home, no matter how adorable they are. Stellaluna is a beautiful story but make sure your kids know to leave wild bats alone.

So much of rabies on screen plays on our fear of the animal. But in reality, it’s the virus—hidden, methodical, and nearly invisible—that’s the true monster.

So let's get back to the stories we tell—and how we use this virus to explore the darkest corners of the human mind.

Rabies on Screen: Beyond Cujo to Cultural Collapse

Rabies isn’t just foaming jaws in Cujo—it’s a shape-shifter that’s haunted the screen for decades. From frontier tragedies to zombie apocalypses, this virus has mutated across genres, infected our monsters, and mirrored our deepest fears.

So… did you check out any of the movies I posted about over the weekend? I watched Cujo and The Barrens—and let me tell you, both still bite. Let’s hit play on some of the most iconic (and unnerving) portrayals of rabies on screen.

🐕 Old Yeller (1957)

It’s the heartbreak that haunted a generation. A boy. His dog. A bite. We never see full-blown aggression—just the early signs: confusion, fever, fear. But those are enough. Travis, the boy, is forced to do the unthinkable: end Old Yeller’s suffering. This isn’t a monster movie. It’s a tragedy. And the message is unforgettable: rabies isn’t evil—but it is unstoppable. And sometimes, mercy is the only ending.

🧟 28 Days Later (2002)

Now crank up the pace. In 28 Days Later, a lab-engineered “rage virus”—directly inspired by rabies—escapes containment and turns London into a feral nightmare. Victims don’t die and rise—they sprint. They scream. They bite.

Director Danny Boyle has said the virus was grounded in biological plausibility, modeled partly on Ebola for its physiological symptoms like hemorrhaging and rabies for its behavioral effects like uncontrollable aggression. But the timeline from infection to symptoms was sped up for cinematic impact. What makes it terrifying isn’t the fantasy—it’s how close it feels to reality.

But with the recently released 28 Years Later, that realism slipped. In a recent interview, the filmmakers suggested exploring what someone might look like after living with the virus for nearly three decades. Scientifically, that doesn’t hold up—rabies doesn’t linger. It destroys. There’s no “living with it” for 28 years. That’s not just stretching plausibility. That’s snapping it in half.

Still, for the original film, the horror worked because it felt possible. It’s not that far from the truth—it's just accelerated.

Now let's dive into I am Legend.

🌍 I Am Legend (2007)

Full transparency, I am a HUGE fan of the Richard Matheson novel, but the movie was fine. It's global scale. Apocalyptic stakes. In the movie version, a genetically modified measles virus—originally designed to cure cancer—mutates into a rabies-like plague. Clearly the aggressive behavior and neurological effects of rabies likely influenced characteristics of individuals infected with the Krippin Virus in the movie. It kills most of humanity, and leaves the rest as light-fearing, hyper-aggressive beings. Here, the virus isn’t just deadly—it’s transformative. The horror isn’t extinction. It’s mutation.

And now for Zombies.

🧟‍♂️ The Walking Dead (2010–2022)

Bite. Turn. Collapse. No, it’s never explicitly called rabies—but the template is there. No cure. Progressive brain damage. The bite is the vehicle. The monster is what remains. Fan theories early on even speculated it was an evolved rabies strain. Whether or not that’s canon, thematically it fits: a society unraveling not because of monsters—but because of infection.

🎙️ Commentary: The Virus Beneath the Plot

So why does rabies keep reappearing in our fiction? Because unlike alien goo or cursed relics, rabies is real. And it already has everything a horror writer dreams of:

• It spreads through a bite.

• It hijacks the brain.

• It turns the familiar into a threat.

• And once symptoms begin… it’s too late.

Rabies is horror—in biology.

So when a movie gives us a killer virus…Or a snarling creature…Or a world unraveling from one bite… It may not say “rabies.” But it’s already in the bloodstream.

Because rabies isn’t just a virus. It’s a story we keep telling—about contagion, collapse, and the fear that the real monster… might be us.

🦠 Public Health Reality Check

Let’s pull back for a moment—from horror to reality. Because rabies isn’t just a metaphor or a monster on screen. It’s still very real. And it’s still killing people. Each year, rabies causes an estimated 59,000 human deaths worldwide, the vast majority of them in Asia and Africa. Most victims are children. In nearly every case, the source is the same: an unvaccinated dog.

💉 And that’s the tragedy. Rabies is 100% preventable. We have vaccines. We have post-exposure treatment. We even have successful wildlife vaccination campaigns in Europe and North America. But where access is limited, and awareness is low, rabies thrives.

🐕 That’s why dog vaccination remains the single most powerful tool for rabies control. It creates a buffer between wild animal reservoirs and human communities. And yet, in many regions, vaccination coverage remains too low to halt transmission.

Bite incidents—especially from stray dogs—go unreported. Wounds go untreated. And people die.

🎥 So what does pop culture have to do with all this?

Well, it cuts both ways.

Stories like Cujo and Old Yeller absolutely raise awareness—they make people feel how scary rabies can be. But they can also mislead. Foaming mouths, violent rages, split-second infections—these are dramatizations. Not epidemiology.

In the real world, rabies doesn’t turn people into zombies. But it does destroy lives.

🎥 Public Health on Screen–The Real Face of Rabies

Before we wrap, I want to spotlight a lesser-known but deeply impactful film. In Seis Días Para Morir—a 1967 Mexican thriller also known as La Rabia—the horror isn’t a foaming dog or a shadowy virus. It’s time. The film follows a desperate race to find children bitten by a rabid dog before their six-day incubation period runs out. Public health workers drive through Mexico City, pleading with the public through loudspeakers, while a sensationalist reporter spreads fear for his own gain.

Infectious disease epidemiologist Dr. René Najera calls it the best rabies movie ever made—not because it’s flashy or frightening, but because it’s true (though a predictable, absolute 6-day incubation period is dramatic license). It captures what real outbreaks look like when surveillance fails, when animals go unvaccinated, and when science and storytelling collide. In fact, Najera has a personal stake—he survived a rabid dog bite as a child in 1980s Mexico, saved by timely vaccine access. But not everyone in this film is so lucky.

Seis Días Para Morir is a cinematic reminder that rabies isn’t just a metaphor. It’s a public health test—one that not every community can afford to fail.

So yes—horror can educate. But that works best when it’s paired with facts. Like here, for example.

OK, so earlier, we looked at Cujo as a story grounded in biology and behavior. But there’s another layer—one that pulls us inward, toward metaphor and memory.

🎥 Deeper Readings & Metaphors

And this involves a deeper reading—one that shifts the focus from biology and suburbia to the inner mind. Some critics and readers see Cujo not just as a story of infection or fear, but as an allegory for addiction. Rabies in the story becomes more than just a biological terror. It echoes the experience of addiction: a force that hijacks the mind, alters behavior, and devastates everything once familiar and safe. In this reading, Cujo isn’t a villain. He’s a vessel—overwhelmed, confused, and overtaken by something he can’t understand or stop.

Many readers connect this theme to Stephen King’s own struggles with addiction during the time Cujo was written—struggles he’s acknowledged publicly. But even without that biographical lens, the symbolism resonates. The virus becomes an allegory for the internal monsters we battle—compulsions that warp who we are, harm those we love, and leave us powerless to stop our own unraveling.

From On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft, King recalls:

“...and there's one novel, Cujo, that I barely remember writing at all. I don’t say that with pride or shame, only with a vague sense of sorrow and loss. I like that book. I wish I could remember enjoying the good parts as I put them down on the page.”

Pro Tip: King's book, On Writing, is one of my favorite books. if you're a King fan or you want to write, read it.

🎬A Monster Made of Memory and Matter

King’s admission—that he scarcely remembers writing Cujo—is haunting in itself. A story about losing control, penned during a time when the author himself felt unmoored. And maybe that’s what makes Cujo resonate so deeply: it’s not just fiction. It’s fear, made personal.

Rabies is one of the oldest and most feared viruses on the planet, with good reason. But sometimes, what we fear says more about us than the thing itself.

On screen, rabies becomes a mirror: reflecting our anxieties about violence, contagion, identity, and the fragility of order. It blurs the lines between the human and the animal, between reason and instinct. But this isn’t just a horror story—it’s a public health story. And with vaccines, education, and timely care, it’s a preventable one.

Because rabies isn’t just cinema’s favorite disease, it’s also a global health challenge, a biological marvel, and an ecological story. If this episode sparked your curiosity, stay tuned: I’ll be diving deeper into more real-world science aspects of rabies in future episodes.

But for now, if you take one thing with you, remember that rabies is rare in many places—but not gone. So stay informed. Vaccinate your pets. Report suspicious bites. And let’s keep this virus where it belongs—on screen, in fiction, and out of our lives.

Thanks for spending this time with me, inside the virus, the stories, and the symbolism. If you enjoyed this episode, follow the show, leave a review, or share it with someone who still checks under the bed after watching Cujo. And if you’ve ever had a rabies scare—or a story that stuck with you—I’d love to hear it.

Until next time: stay safe, stay curious… and maybe give your dog a second scratch behind the ears tonight.